[Matt__]

I saw the Enence Translator claims 1.5 second translations. In real use with someone talking fast, does it actually keep up? I tried a friend’s unit and it felt more like 2 or 3 seconds, but maybe it was just the language pair. Curious if others noticed the same.

[Susan Keller]

Mine is usually closer to 3 seconds too.

[Susan Kennet]

The 1.5 seconds seems to assume perfect conditions. When I watched a demo in a noisy shop it took way longer because it kept asking the speaker to repeat. Background noise seems to mess with it more than the language itself.

[Alex Morgan]

I used one for a week in Japan and it was nowhere near 1.5 seconds for me either. Japanese to English usually took a couple seconds, sometimes a bit more if I spoke a full sentence. I still found it handy, just not as instant as the box makes it sound.

[Laura Check]

Their 1.5 second number is probably for short simple phrases in ideal conditions. I tested one for a few days and longer sentences definitely pushed past that. For quick stuff like asking directions it was close enough, but normal conversation speed it lagged. Not a dealbreaker, just don’t expect the marketing number to hold up.

[Chloe M.]

I never really expected it to hit 1.5 seconds anyway, that number just seems like a best case thing. For me the bigger thing is that I don’t mind a short pause as long as the translation comes out right. I’d rather wait an extra second than get a fast but wrong sentence back. That’s just my preference though.

[Rivers]

1.5 seconds is a marketing number, not a real world one. Mine does fine with short back and forth stuff, but the second someone rambles it falls apart and I end up repeating myself. That gap adds up fast when you’re actually trying to have a conversation.

[Riley1]

Mine lags way more on longer sentences.

[HarrY]

Mine actually got close to that on a few short greetings, so I don’t think the number is total nonsense. It was French and Spanish though, both pretty common. The moment I tried anything with names or numbers it went right past 3 seconds.

[Emma__L]

I always assumed the 1.5 seconds thing was mostly about the pause after you stop talking, not the whole exchange. Like the device starts spitting out the translation fast once it actually hears a complete sentence. That part I can sort of believe.

What got me was trying to use it with my cousin who talks nonstop. He doesn’t pause for breath. The thing just sat there listening while he rambled for like twenty seconds, and then it gave me a translation that was basically a summary. Which to be fair was kind of impressive, but it’s a completely different thing from fast back and forth.

The practical detail that surprised me is how much battery it chews through when it’s working hard on long stretches like that. I borrowed one for a weekend trip and it was dead by mid afternoon the second day, and I wasn’t even using it constantly. Short greetings and ordering food, fine. But if you’re leaning on it for actual conversations with someone chatty, you’re going to be hunting for a charger.

So I don’t really know what to make of the 1.5 number. For a quick “where’s the train station” type thing it feels about right. For anything with real back and forth it just doesn’t apply, and honestly I stopped paying attention to the seconds after a while.

[Dave the Curious]

Mine felt closer to three seconds too.

[Alex Reed]

Probably depends what you count. Mine reacts fast once I stop talking but the whole back and forth still feels slow in person. I got it for quick stuff like asking directions, not real conversations.

[Ryan__T]

2 or 3 seconds matches what I got too, so the 1.5 thing is mostly just the pause after you stop talking. I don’t think that’s a dealbreaker though, people fixate on the number when the real issue is how it handles fast talkers. For me it’s fine for basic stuff and that’s about it.

[Matt__]

Good enough for me, closing this out.

[Author]

Posts